EICR Remedial Works Explained: A Practical UK Guide for Duty Holders

EICR remedial works are the corrective actions required after an Electrical Installation Condition Report identifies unsafe or non-compliant issues within an electrical installation.

For many duty holders, the EICR itself is not the problem. The real challenge begins once the report highlights defects that must be addressed.

This guide explains what EICR remedial works are, why they matter, how they are prioritised, and how facilities managers and responsible persons should manage them to remain compliant and reduce risk.

What Are EICR Remedial Works?

EICR remedial works are electrical repairs or improvements needed to correct issues identified during fixed wire testing (EICR).

These works are required when an EICR identifies conditions that:

• Present immediate danger

• Increase the risk of electric shock or fire

• Fail to meet current safety standards

• Cannot be justified as safe for continued use

Remedial works are not optional recommendations. They are actions required to restore electrical safety.

Why EICR Remedial Works Are Required

Electrical installations degrade over time. Cables age, connections loosen, usage changes, and previous modifications may no longer be suitable.

EICR remedial works are required to:

• Reduce risk to occupants

• Prevent electrical fires

• Ensure legal compliance

• Protect organisations from enforcement action

• Maintain insurance validity

Ignoring remedial works means knowingly accepting electrical risk.

Understanding EICR Codes and Their Impact

EICR observations are categorised using specific codes. These codes determine whether remedial works are required.

Some observations are advisory. Others demand action.

Understanding the difference is critical.

Common Examples of EICR Remedial Works

Typical remedial works include:

• Repairing or replacing damaged cabling

• Correcting inadequate earthing or bonding

• Replacing obsolete or unsafe distribution boards

• Securing exposed live parts

• Resolving overheating identified through thermal imaging surveys

The scope of work varies depending on the installation and level of risk.

Legal Responsibilities After a Failed EICR

Under the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989, electrical systems must be maintained so as to prevent danger.

A failed EICR demonstrates that this duty has not been met.

Duty holders include:

• Employers

• Landlords

• Building owners

• Managing agents

• Responsible persons under fire safety legislation

Once remedial works are identified, action must be taken within a reasonable timeframe.

How Quickly Must EICR Remedial Works Be Completed?

Timeframes depend on the severity of the issue.

• Immediate dangers must be addressed straight away

• Urgent defects require prompt scheduling

• Lower-risk items still require planned resolution

Delays must be justifiable, documented, and supported by interim risk controls where applicable.

Planning EICR Remedial Works in Occupied Buildings

Facilities managers often need to balance safety with operational continuity.

Effective planning includes:

• Phasing works by risk

• Out-of-hours working where needed

• Temporary isolation strategies

• Clear communication with occupants

A competent contractor will support this process, not disrupt it.

Verification and Certification After Remedial Works

Once works are completed, they must be verified.

This may involve:

• Minor electrical installation works certificates

• Updated EICR reports

• Supporting photographic evidence

Without certification, compliance cannot be demonstrated.

How Protest ES Ltd Supports EICR Remedial Works

Protest ES Ltd provides a structured approach to electrical remedial repairs, supporting clients from initial EICR through to final sign-off.

Services include:

• Fixed wire testing

• Remedial repair planning

• Thermal imaging

• Certification and reporting

• Ongoing compliance support

Summary for Duty Holders

• EICR remedial works correct unsafe electrical conditions

• They are a legal requirement, not optional

• Codes determine urgency and scope

• Poor planning increases risk and disruption

• Proper verification protects organisations